User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-LA; LG-KF510 Obigo) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKF510 Obigo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGKF510smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGKF510 Obigocloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGKF510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Gecko LGKF510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:03 | by ThaDafinser