User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; GT-P3100 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-697.php
Chrome 43.0Android 4.1unknown SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 7.0Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.1SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 7.0Tabletyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Tab 2 7"tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-P3100closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.65006 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 43closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-P3100Tabletyesyescloseclose0.11601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:03 | by ThaDafinser