User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.1 (PantechP7040/JLUS04042011)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
OneBrowser 3.1 PantechP7040mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.1WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 3.1close PantechP7040mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.1WebKit PantechP7040smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.1close PantechP7040closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.1 PantechP7040mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:02 | by ThaDafinser