User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; VT75C Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
VideoconVT75C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.1.1VideoconVT75Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.1VideoconVT75Csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.1.1VideoconVT75Ccloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.1.1VT75Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.07901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1VideoconVT75CTabletyesyescloseclose0.07501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:02 | by ThaDafinser