User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux Core i7-4980HQ; de; rv:32.0; compatible; Jobboerse.com; http://www.xn--jobbrse-d1a.com) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/24.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesJobBoerse BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesJobBoerse BotBot/Crawler0.13801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 24.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 24.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 24.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 24.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 24.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 24.0Gecko 20100401Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 24.0Gecko 32.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 24.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:02 | by ThaDafinser