User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-L770S/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.4 Qtv5.3 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-L770S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-L770S 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungSGH L770mobile-browseryescloseclose0.68107 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungSGH-L770Ssmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSGH-L770Scloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SamsungSGH-L770Smobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSGH L770Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:02 | by ThaDafinser