User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.44 Safari/537.36 OPR/24.0.1558.25 (Edition Next)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 24.0OS X Yosemite 10.10Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 24.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.05201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 24.0.1558.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 24.0.1558.25closeOS X 10.10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 24.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 24.0.1558.25closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 24.0.1558closeMac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.44closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 24.0.1558.25WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56906 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 24.0Blink OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 24.0.1558.25closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 24.0.1558.25closeMac OS X 10.10.0Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:01 | by ThaDafinser