User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; Series60/5.2 NokiaN8-00/111.040.1511; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 5.2 NokiaN8-00mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.07801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 5.2NokiaN8-00mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 5.2 Symbian^3 NokiaN8smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 111.040.1511;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 5.2closeSymbian^3 NokiaN8-00closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia N8-00closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 5.2NokiaN8-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian ^3NokiaN8-00Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:00 | by ThaDafinser