User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows Phone 8.0; Trident/6.0; IEMobile/10.0; ARM; Touch; HTC; A620t; CMCC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCA620t Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 10.0Trident 6.0WinPhone8 8.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows HTCA620tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 10.0Trident Windows Phone 8.0HTCA620tsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows Phone 8closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0HTCA620tcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone 8.0HTC8Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0HTCA620tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:00 | by ThaDafinser