User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; xx; YunOS/2.3.0-E1-20131121.1608) AppleWebKit/536.28 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/536.28 Tanggula/1.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-aliyun.yaml
Aliyun Browser Aliyun OS 2.3.0Webkit 536.28mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit YunOs 2.3desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.17102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 536.28Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aliyun Browser Webkit 536.28Aliyun OS 2.3.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:59 | by ThaDafinser