User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Cat Tablet PHOENIX 8.1J0 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CatTablet PHOENIX 8.1J0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.24402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1CatPHOENIX 8.1J0tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.1CatTablet PHOENIX 8.1J0closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Phoenix 8.1J0 BuildcloseAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Phoenix WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.1CATPHOENIXtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.09001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:59 | by ThaDafinser