User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 11.01Windows XPPresto 2.7.62desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.01Presto 2.7WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.01closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.01Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.01closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.01closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.1Presto 2.7.62Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.01Presto 2.7.62Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser