User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.0; de-de;) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1 (Kobo Touch)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
KoboKobo Touch Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.0KoboTouchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.0closeAndroid 2.0KoboKobo Touchcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.1 KoboeReaderereaderyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.0closeAndroid 2.0KoboTouchTabletyesyescloseclose0.05201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser