User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 1091) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.91 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1387.37 (Edition Next)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera Next 20.0.1387.37Mac Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1387.37closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeOS X 1091desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 20.0Blink Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeOS X 1091closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1387closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.91closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1387.37WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 1091closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 20.0Blink OS X 1091desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeMac OS X 1091Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser