User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64) KHTML/4.12.4 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.12FreeBSD KHTML 4.12.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.12closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.12KHTML FreeBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.21302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.12 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.12KHTML 4.12.4FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser