User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 MG (Novarra-Vision/6.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-novarra.yaml
Novarra Vision 6.1 Gecko 1.8.0mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 1.5Gecko 1.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 1.5.0.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 1.5.0.7closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 1.5Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 1.5.0.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 1.5.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 1.5.0.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Vision Mobile Browser 6.1Gecko 20060909Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Novarra Vision 6.1Gecko 1.8.0 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 1.5.0.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser