User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/2.1.2; X11)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Konqueror 2.1unknown unknownunknown unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 2.1KHTML Desktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 2.1.2close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 2.1KHTML 0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 2.1.2;close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 2.1.2close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 2.1.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 2.1.2 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 2.1.2 desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser