User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Kubuntu; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 11.0Ubuntu Gecko 10.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 11.0Gecko 11.0Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 11.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 11.0Gecko Kubuntu desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 11.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 11.0closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 11.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 11.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 11.0Gecko 10.0Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 11.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:58 | by ThaDafinser