User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; SPH-P500 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/manufacturer-samsung.yaml
Chrome 39Android 4.1.2Blink 537.36SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 10.1tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.17502 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.1SamsungSPH-P500smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 39.0.2171closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungSPH-P500closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 39Blink Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 10.1tabletyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 39closeAndroid 4.1SamsungSPH-P500Tabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:57 | by ThaDafinser