User agent detail

htc touch 3g t3232/UC Browser7.9.0.102/69/352 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCtouch 3g t3232 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
htc closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.102close HTCtouch 3g t3232mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 HTCtouch 3gsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0close HTCtouch 3g t3232closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.102 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Gecko Windows Mobile HTCTouch 3Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:56 | by ThaDafinser