User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ru; Desktop) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Windows VistaWebkit 534.13desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeWindows 6.0email-clientcloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.13Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.13Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:56 | by ThaDafinser