User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5/7; en-us ; W626 Build/GRJ90) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.6.1.262/145/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PhilipsW626 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.14902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 2.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.1closeAndroid 2.3.5PhilipsW626closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.08601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.1.262WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5PhilipsW626mobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:56 | by ThaDafinser