User agent detail

MOT-c350M/AS_G_09.04.23R MIB/2.0 UP.Link/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorolac350M Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 MotorolaC350MMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-c350M AScloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0close MotorolaC350Mmobile-browseryescloseclose0.62206 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Motorolac350Msmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolac350Mcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 Motorolac350Mmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaC350MFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:55 | by ThaDafinser