User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; WebPositive/533.4; Haiku) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.55 Safari/533.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
WebPositive Haiku Webkit 533.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 5.0.375.55close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WebPositive WebKit Haiku OS desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 5.0.375close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 5.0.375.55closeHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 5.0.375.55WebKit 533.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebPositive Webkit 533.4Haiku desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 5.0.375.99closeMac OS X 10.6.2Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:54 | by ThaDafinser