User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.0.5 Mobile/11B554a Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
QQ Browser 5.0.5iOS 7.0.4WebKit AppleiPhone 4smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 4smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0.5closeiOS 7.0.4closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 7.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.0.5WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhone 4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:53 | by ThaDafinser