User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; D6708 Build/23.0.E.0.307) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-sony.yaml
Chrome 35Android 4.4.4Blink 537.36SonyXperia Z3vmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.4SonyD6708mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.4smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.4D6708closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.4.4SonyXperia Z3vmobile:smartyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.4SonyD6708Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:53 | by ThaDafinser