User agent detail

Dr.Web anti-virus Light Version: 7.00.8.7029 Device model: HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e Firmware version: 4.0.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e Firmware version: 4.0.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dr closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCSensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e Firmware version: 4.0.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCSensation XEsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCSensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e Firmware version: 4.0.3closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dr. Web Light 7.00 Android 4.0.3HTCSensation XEmobile:smartyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:53 | by ThaDafinser