User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.81 Safari/537.36 OPR/30.0.1835.140
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 30.0Windows 8.1Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 30.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 30.0.1835.140closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 30.0.1835.140closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 30.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 30.0.1835.140closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 30.0.1835closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 30.0.1835.140WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 30.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 30.0.1835.140closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 30.0.1835.140closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:52 | by ThaDafinser