User agent detail

LG-G220/V100/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGG220 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
LG JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-G220 V100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGG220mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGG220smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGG220closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGG220closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGG220mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.06201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:52 | by ThaDafinser