User agent detail

lg-kf750-v10a browser/obigo-q05a/3.12 mms/lg-mms-v1.0/1.2 java/asvm/1.1 profile/midp-2.1 configuration/cldc-1.1; Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.0.10269/546; de; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGkf750 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 4.0Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 4.0.10269closeJVM LGLG/KF750/v1.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 4.0Presto LGkf750smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 4.0.10269close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 4.0.10269close LGkf750closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 4.0.10269close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGkf750closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5 LGkf750mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 4.0close LGLG/KF750/v1.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:51 | by ThaDafinser