User agent detail

psbot-page (+http://www.picsearch.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-417.php
yesPicsearch BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesPicsearch BotBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
psbot-page closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesPicsearch botclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesPicsearch botSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyespsbotclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyespsbotCrawler0.22202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesPicsearch botclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:51 | by ThaDafinser