User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; RC0719H Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.114 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125.114Android 4.2.2Blink 3QRC0719Htablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125.114closeAndroid 4.2.23QRC0719Hmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 4.23QRC0719Htabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.2.23QRC0719Hcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.2.23QQoo! Q-Pad RC0719Htabletyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.23QRC0719HTabletyesyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:50 | by ThaDafinser