User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 1.5Gecko 1.0SunOS Desktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 1.5.0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 1.5.0.5closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 1.5Gecko Solaris desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 1.5.0.5closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 1.5.0closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 1.5.0.5closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.18202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 1.5.0.5Gecko 20060728SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 1.5.0.5Gecko 1.8.0Solaris desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 1.5.0.5closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeWindows XPNovarraCTS reformatting proxyOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:50 | by ThaDafinser