User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-176.php
Firefox 27.0Ubuntu unknown27.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 27.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 27.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 27.0Gecko Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 27.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 27.0closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 27.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 27.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 27.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 27.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:50 | by ThaDafinser