User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (x86 [en] Windows NT 5.1; Sun)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Netscape 3.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 3.0Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
HotJava 3.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows XPdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 3.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 3.0 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 3.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:49 | by ThaDafinser