User agent detail

PANTECH-EUROPA-U4000-orange/1.0 Obigo/Q04C MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechEUROPA-U4000-orange Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PANTECH-EUROPA-U4000-orange 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM PantechEUROPA U4000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q04C PantechEUROPAsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 4close PantechEUROPA-U4000-orangecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q04C Browser Q04C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 4C PantechEUROPA-U4000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q04Cclose PantechEUROPA U4000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:49 | by ThaDafinser