User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_4 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-811.php
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeOS X 10.9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeMac OS X 10.9.4closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125 SafaricloseOS X 10.9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:48 | by ThaDafinser