User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; ru; Golf) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.1.494 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.5Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SamsungGT-I9060mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.494 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Android 4.2.2Golfmobile:smartyescloseclose0.07201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:48 | by ThaDafinser