User agent detail

HTC_Touch_HD_T8282 Opera/9.50 (Windows NT 5.1; U; ru)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch_HD_T8282 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.50Presto 2.2 HTCTouch HD T8282Mobile Phoneyes0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.50closeWindows 5.1HTCTouch HD T8282mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows XPHTCTouch HD T8282smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP HTCTouch_HD_T8282closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows Windows NT 5.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile HTCTouch HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTC8282Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:48 | by ThaDafinser