User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; bingbot/2.0 http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
bingbot 2.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingBotBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
bingbot 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBingclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesbingbotclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesBingbotCrawler0.15102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingBot 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBingclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesbingbotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:47 | by ThaDafinser