User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/17.0.963.26 Chrome/17.0.963.26 Safari/535.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chromium 17.0.963.26Ubuntu 10.10Webkit 535.11desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 17.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 17.0.963.26closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 17.0WebKit Ubuntu 10.10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 17.0.963closeUbuntu 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 17.0.963.26WebKit 535.11Linux 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 17.0.963.26Webkit 535.11Ubuntu 10.10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:47 | by ThaDafinser