User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; i-mobile i-STYLE 8.2A Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobilei-STYLE 8.2A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.2i-mobilei-Style 8.2Asmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.2imobilei-STYLE 8.2Acloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.72WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.2.2i-mobile i-STYLE 8.2Amobile:smartyescloseclose0.10201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:47 | by ThaDafinser