User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2.; Linux 2.4.20-gentoo-r2; X11; i
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Gentoo 2.4.20 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.2KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.2.closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.2KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.2.;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.2closeGentoo 2.4.20closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.2.close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.2 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.2 Linux desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:46 | by ThaDafinser