User agent detail

ALCATEL-OT-505/10 OBIGOINTERNETBROWSER/Q03C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOT-505 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ALCATEL-OT-505 10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03C AlcatelOT-505smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close AlcatelOT-505closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C AlcatelOne Touch 505mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:46 | by ThaDafinser