User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Hudl HT7S3 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 33.0.1750.136Android 4.2.2Blink TescoHudl HT7S3tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.13001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2TescoHudl HT7S3tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2Hudl HT7S3closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2TescoHudltabletyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2TescoHudl HT7S3Tabletyesyescloseclose0.11601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:46 | by ThaDafinser