User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru; K1 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.8.9.457 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.8Android 4.2unknown VodafoneIdeaPad K1Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.8U3 Android 4.2VodafoneIdeaPad K1Tabletyesyes0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2KingZoneK1 turbomobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.8WebKit Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.8.9closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoIdeapad K1closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.8.9.457WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.8Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2LenovoIdeaPad K1tabletyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:46 | by ThaDafinser