User agent detail

Nokia6700c-1/2.0 (07.60) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Webkit 420Nokia6700 classicmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser WebKit JAVA Nokia6700cMobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia6700c-1smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6700c-1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6700c-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia6700 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6700 classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:45 | by ThaDafinser