User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/536.26.14 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 5.1.7OS X Mountain Lion 10.8Webkit 536.26.14desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.7closeOS X 10.8.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.7closeOS X 10.8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1.7closeMac OS X 10.8.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.7closeOS X 10.8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.7WebKit 536.26.14Mac OS X 10.8.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1.7Webkit 536.26.14OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.1.3closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:45 | by ThaDafinser