User agent detail

Chrome/15.0.860.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.0.860.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-784.php
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 15.0.860.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 15.0.860.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 15.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 15.0.860.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 15.0.860closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 15.0.860.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 15.0.860.0WebKit 533.20.25Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 15.0.860.0Webkit 533.20.25Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:45 | by ThaDafinser