User agent detail

MQQBrowser/1.0/Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows Phone 8.0; Trident/6.0; IEMobile/10.0; NOKIA; RM-910apacprc200)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
QQ Browser 1.0Windows Phone 8.0Trident 6.0NokiaLumia 925mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 1.0closeWindows GenericWindows Phone 8mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 1.0Trident Windows Phone 8.0NokiaRM-910apacprc200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows Phone 8closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 1.0closeWindows Phone 8.0NokiaRM-910closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 1.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 1.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone 8.0NokiaLumia 925mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 8.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:45 | by ThaDafinser